Chamber Member, Member Submission

Canadian businesses are moving rapidly from asking whether they should use artificial intelligence to deciding how deeply it should be embedded in their operations. Statistics Canada reported in June 2026 that 19.2% of Canadian businesses had used AI to produce goods or deliver services in the previous 12 months - more than triple the proportion reported two years earlier. Among businesses already using AI, 44.4% had changed training or staffing practices as a result.

That matters because AI is no longer simply a technology decision. It is becoming a workforce, leadership and organizational-design decision. For Edmonton businesses, the opportunity is significant. But so is the strategic question: How do we capture the productivity benefits of AI without inadvertently weakening the human capabilities our organizations will still depend on? That is where human sustainability becomes relevant.

Human Sustainability Belongs in Business Strategy

Human sustainability means designing organizations so that human capability, health, judgment and capacity to contribute are sustained or strengthened, rather than progressively depleted. It asks leaders to consider the long-term condition of the human system with the same seriousness they bring to financial, operational and technological systems. This is not simply a wellness issue. It is a business-design issue.

Efficiency Alone is Not a Strategy

AI can reduce administrative work, accelerate analysis, improve customer service and remove low-value tasks. Those gains are real. But efficiency becomes strategically incomplete when organizations automate work without asking what happens to learning, discernment, accountability and institutional knowledge.

Consider a junior employee who once learned by researching, drafting, observing experienced colleagues and receiving feedback. If AI now performs much of that early-stage work, productivity may increase immediately. But where will tomorrow’s experienced professional come from?

The same question applies to leadership. If technology increasingly recommends decisions, organizations must become even more deliberate about who remains accountable, what requires human judgment, and how that judgment will continue to develop.

The companies that benefit most from AI may therefore not be those that automate the most. They may be those that are clearest about what should be automated, what should be augmented, and what must remain distinctly human.

Five Questions Leadership Teams Should Ask Now

Before expanding AI across a business, leaders should ask:

1. What problem are we actually trying to solve? Start with the business problem, not the technology.
2. Which human capabilities become more valuable when this task is automated? Time saved should be deliberately redirected toward higher-value work.
3. What skills could unintentionally atrophy? Identify where employees still need practice, judgment, mentorship and experiential learning.
4. Who remains accountable? AI can inform a decision. It cannot absorb an organization’s responsibility for the consequences.
5. How will we know whether adoption is sustainable? Measure more than productivity. Consider quality, capability, errors, trust, customer outcomes, workload and retention.

Human Capability is Becoming a Competitive Issue

The World Economic Forum’s Future of Jobs Report 2025 identifies AI and big data among the fastest-growing skill areas. Yet employers also expect growing importance for creative thinking, resilience and agility, curiosity, leadership and talent management. That is not a contradiction. It is the emerging competitive landscape. As technology becomes more capable, human capability does not become irrelevant. The valuable human contribution shifts.

Edmonton has an opportunity to get this right. Our economy brings together artificial intelligence, entrepreneurship, construction, professional services, education and a growing innovation ecosystem. The next stage should not be framed as humans versus technology.

A more useful question is how we design organizations in which technology expands what humans are capable of accomplishing. Businesses that ask that question early may build more than efficient organizations. They may build organizations capable of adapting repeatedly without exhausting the people responsible for that adaptation. As AI becomes embedded in your organization, what human capability are you intentionally building alongside it?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Author: Lina Bil, MBA, CLC, CPHR, is an Edmonton-based HR executive, organizational consultant and founder of the Human Sustainability Institute. She is the author of the forthcoming book Human Sustainability: Mindful Leadership and the Human Advantage in the Age of Artificial Intelligence, available on Amazon.